My latest
Newsweek (3/9/2009) had an article entitled "Rethinking Race in the Classroom." While books like
To Kill a Mockingbird and
Huckleberry Finn and
Of Mice and Men have always been controversial, apparently the argument that it's time to stop teaching books that use the "N" word. A (white) teacher who wrote an editorial in support of this said, "...we have this very articulate, smart, and intelligent black man running the country, we don't need to reinforce the same negative stereotypes...I'm very tired of having to explain to black parents and white kids why these books use the "N" word over and over again..." A professor at USC said "I think there is a certain sector of the country that now feels racism is over, let's move on."
Um...well, if that were the case, then why did we celebrate the election of the BLACK president? Why is race such a factor when candidates push for the black and Latino voters? I'm not a big fan of Black History Month, in part because I think it's a bit like tokenism, but I don't think I'm naive to think that we do not carry the legacy of our past today. We are all of us shaped by our past, even if it's a past that we don't feel like we can "relate" to anymore. That's where literature comes in. I can read about any event in history and learn all about it. The only way I can even begin to emphathize or get any glimpse into what it was really like is through the arts, and that's literature for me. It's those words, those images, that we are so fortuneate to have received, that show us what those historical events
mean, what they
did to people. Do they perpetuate negative stereotypes? Or do they show us how far we've come, show us where we may still need to go, and why we do and see and feel the things we feel today?
Do these stories portray African-Americans as inarticulate and unintelligent? Yes, at times, (although I would strongly debate that point in
Mockingbird's Tom Robinson). But let me step out on an very un-PC limb and ask if those portrayals weren't rooted in the reality of so many people? Not because they were inherently stupid or genetically deficient as they were told and so many believed, but because they had been denied education, or culture, or any kind of a voice that would allow them in large part to be anything else but uneducated. In the case of Tom Robinson, is that really the message? Tom Robinson is a family man, a man of integrity and compassion, a man whose only crime was to feel sorry for a white girl. How is this man not worthy of our respect as a heroic figure? Wouldn't we be better served to examine those portrayals from an historical perspective? What past historical event
isn't hard to relate to? Should we stop teaching about the Holocaust? or Native Americans simply because it involves sensitive or painful or unpleasant vocabulary or themes?
And to deny us Tom Robinson, a hero of character and virtue, a man victimized by racism, would be a great loss. To deny us Tom Robinson is to deny us Atticus Finch, a man who risked his life and that of his children to fight against the tide of hatred. To deny us Tom Robinson would be to deny us Boo Radley, a man every bit a victimized by the circumstances of his time, who taught us all a lesson about acceptance. Can't we learn lessons from them in this day and age, as we struggle to come to grips with our attitudes towards immigrants, Muslims, and anyone that doesn't fit our neat and tidy packages? And Huck, and Lenny, and George--characters that are the essence of our American culture, flawed, yes, products of their times, yes--as we are products of our own. I have learned more, felt more, and grown more from these men than I have from any history textbook. I'm sorry that the teacher is "tired" of difficult themes and difficult conversations. I believe that it's our jobs as teachers to be in those difficult situations, to push the envelope--and in the case of literature, to continue to make it relevant. If that's the litmus test, we can consign algebra, poetry and chemistry to the rubbish bin. The vast majority of us have little active use for it in our daily lives. You don't find those kinds of lessons in Cliff's Notes. They come from the heart. And kids will rise to the challenge--they are capable of so much more than we give them credit for.