Thursday, October 23, 2008

Book Blast from the Past

I am friends with some great readers. I used to think I was a voracious reader. Then I met Karen. And Calandria. And Ann. Smart, smart people who read so many different books by so many authors in so many genres. One of the biggest frustrations of living overseas is that my friends are reading and talking about great books, which I can't get my hands on.

All of them great readers. But I happen to know that one of my smartest friends harbors a secret desire to be a Harlequin romance novelist. Another reads detective fiction, the kind that I can't figure out why she reads and likes, because I find them predictable--and I'm not high-brow at all and she's so smart.


Then I started thinking about books I've read. Not books that have influenced me. Not books that make any sort of a profound statement. Other than people who write books can write schlock and make a truckload of money. And they know how to paragraph, something Blogger hasn't figured out yet. But (shush, don't tell) they are books I read a LOT back in the day. Books I probably may have hid from my mother. Books that make beach reads look like Shakespeare. Remember these gems?




This still makes banned book lists. It's a lot more tame than it was back when I was in high school. Remember how everyone thought it was about Art Linkletter's daughter? Even though no one really knew who Art Linkletter was? (It wasn't). The descent into to drugs was not so alarming, but remember when she has the flashback and thought her face was melting? That was some "wow." And then she got clean again and makes the decision to start over. And then you get the epilogue that she died--maybe because of another flashback, maybe suicide. Everyone read this.




This is quite possibly one of the best worst series of books. It had everything. Four siblings locked in an attic by the evil grandmother after their mother died. Except she didn't die. She was forced to lock them up by said evil grandmother. Except she wasn't. She wanted to do it so she could get married or something. And she poisoned the young twins with arsenic. And the older siblings got all "Endless Love" together, hormones and being locked up and all. And then when the little twins got really sick, they escaped. And one died. And they all ran away and were found by handsome older doctor. Oldest brother said "thanks" by becoming a doctor, too. Older sister said "thanks" in a whole 'nother way, if you get my drift. And they were still caught up in those "feelings" from the attic. And then Catherine married a ballet star. Because she was good enough to be a prima ballerina after being starved and locked in an attic. But then he got paralyzed.

Subsequent books go downhill from there. If this had been a soap opera, I'd've been hooked. The movie was terrible, worse than the book, though. Why is that?



OMG, Sarah, do you remember this? This was hot in late junior high. Sarah had a pretty strict mother, but somehow she ended up being much more "in the know" about a lot of things. Like this book. We shared a lot of these books together. My other long-time friend...well, she just wasn't ready, I guess. It had drama, and tension, and lots of s*x. I'm pretty sure I learned new vocabulary words. I just remember being astonished that people could actually write stuff like that down. On paper.

Judith Krantz is one of my favorite schlocky authors. Her plots are completely impausible, her characters impossibly beautiful and rich and royal, and she shamelessly namedrops fashion designers, restaurants, hotels, and other chi-chi labels in every sentence she writes. Since I imagine she doesn't actually live this kind of life, her research is amazing.

Remember Princess Daisy and her twin who was handicapped and shut away? And her half-brother tried to attack her and she ran away to New York where she painted pictures of rich people and ponies and sacrified so she could pay for her sister's care? And how she was so beautiful she became a model? And how everything good came to her and not to that nasty half-brother? And how she and Patrick the rich publisher guy fell in love riding a troika at a Russian-themed party?

I could write about meaningful books, powerful books, life-changing books. I bet I've read any of these books 15 times, although not for 20 years or so. But I gotta say, if I saw a Judith Krantz laying around, I'd pounce on it like a cat on a mouse.

So now it's your turn to come clean. What did you read back whenever...or now? Any beauties to add to this list?

Addition: Oooh, I had forgotten these great standbys: Mr. and Mrs. BoJo Jones (teenage pregnancy and marriage) and The Best Little Girl in the World (anorexia). Both stem from the great tradition of the ABC AfterSchool Special, that repository of health and character education for the latchkey set. Also the Judy Blume hot books, Wifey and Forever. Those didn't leave much of an impression on me. I guess when you're learning at the feet of the great Sidney Sheldon, you've gone beyond Judy Blume.

5 comments:

andalucy said...

Hahaha! This post is so awesome. Guilty pleasures, huh? I love your description of the Flowers in the Attic series, lol. Something reminded me of those books just recently. Yes, I did read them in seventh grade I think [blush of shame].

Hey, Jane Austen enjoyed "bad" books. Why shouldn't we? We wouldn't have the hilarious Northanger Abbey if old Jane hadn't read all those ridiculous gothic romances.

I've got to think about this so I can come up with my list.

Sarah said...

I love the way you bring up some of the most interesting and long forgotten pleasures. The Reincarnation of Peter Proud. I borrowed it from someone. (You?)And then mom found it and burned it. "Sarah, the black smoke just rolled from it." So I snuck and bought it, because not only was it borrowed and needed to be returned, but I hadn't finished it!! And she found it again. And burned it again. So I bought it again, finished it, and returned it. So really, mom supported the sales of that one. I tried to remind her of all this a year or two ago but she says it never happened. Ha. I still rmemeber where I hid it. Badly, obviously!

Mama Ava said...

I do remember "Peter Proud." Your mother was nothing if not persistent and consistent. And I think we also read "Looking for Mr. Goodbar" which I recently re-read and there really wasn't that much in it. I think it was more the idea of the life the woman led, searching for love and acceptance with random guys. Or maybe it was the movie that ended up being graphic, which I didn't see.

Yeah, where did we get these books? It's not like they were in the school library or we had a bookstore in town. Maybe we got them at the town library...

Calandria, Jane was so smart and clever...and I love her wit which can be both subtle and direct. I wonder what she would think about our "bad" books? Poor girl.

Ave said...

I used to sneak into Calandria's room and paw through her stuff, that is where I found Alice and Catcher in the Rye. I was in sixth grade when I read those I think. I didn't know about VC Andrews until I got a job working in a library. These books have all been replaced by those Gossip Girl novels. Talk about skank!

Mama Ava said...

Thanks, Ave. But, sad though it may be, I would have to rate "Flowers in the Attic" above "Gossip Girl." I haven't seen the show, but books that are derived from movies, not to mention TV shows, not to mention *skanky* television...

I mean, VC Andrew at least thought up those books on her own (or on his own).